intellectual virtues (by focusing on epistemic function of religius belief acquiring ability

نویسندگان

اکرم عسکرزاده مزرعه

دانشجوی دکتری دانشگاه پیام نور ، ایران، تهران سید علی علم الهدی

دانشیار دانشگاه پیام نور، ایران، تهران، گروه فلسفه جلال پی کانی

دانشیار دانشگاه پیام نور، ایران، تهران، گروه فلسفه

چکیده

comparison of mula sadra’s epistemology theory and virtual epistemology theories of zagzebski and platinga infers that the former’s theory can be categorized as a virtual epistemology. platinga believes in virtue of forming faculties and zagzebski believes in function of intellectual power in forming episteme. in fact, both of them believe is some aspects of the elements effective in formation and development of belief so that none of the theories are free of objection. mula sadra, on the other hand, believes in virtue of belief forming faculties, effect of moral faculties function on intellectual faculties, and their interactive function in forming belief and truth conductivity process. plantinga argues that only belief forming faculties may form beliefs, while zagzebski and mula sadra argue that moral faculties prepare the ground form formation of true beliefs and that belief formation is an attribute of belief forming faculties. in addition to belief forming and ground preparing faculties, mula sadra proposes reliability and truth conductivity processes of revelation and inspiration as two other processes that form reliable and true beliefs.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Epistemic Virtues of Consistency

The lottery paradox has been discussed widely. The standard solution to the lottery paradox is that a ticket holder is justified in believing each ticket will lose but the ticket holder is also justified in believing not all of the tickets will lose. If the standard solution is true, then we get the paradoxical result that it is possible for a person to have a justified set of beliefs that she ...

متن کامل

Epistemic Virtues and Epistemic Values: A Skeptical Critique1

Epistemic virtues or epistemic values, we are told, play a major role in our assessments of the bearing of evidence in science. There is something quite right about this notion; and there is something quite wrong about it. My goal in the chapter is to explain each. In brief, what is right about the notion of epistemic virtue or value is that criteria such as simplicity and explanatory power do ...

متن کامل

Biogerontology and the intellectual virtues.

The case for prioritizing the study of the biology of aging can be persuasively made by making explicit its connection to the exercise of the intellectual virtues needed to realize well-ordered science. These intellectual virtues include a range of attitudes and dispositions integral to all areas of science (e.g. sensitivity to details, adaptability of intellect, the detective's virtues), but t...

متن کامل

Modeling Belief Change on Epistemic States

Belief revision always results in trusting new evidence, so it may admit an unreliable one and discard a more confident one. We therefore use belief change instead of belief revision to remedy this weakness. By introducing epistemic states, we take into account of the strength of evidence that influences the change of belief. In this paper, we present a set of postulates to characterize belief ...

متن کامل

Iterated Belief Change Based on Epistemic

insightful comments on an earlier draft of this paper. I thank the referees for Erkenntnis who, apart from giving extended commen ts and suggestions, provided me with some hard-to-nd relevant material. I also thank Williams for their suggestions. The errors that remain are, of course, m ine. Abstract In this paper it is argued that, in order to solve the problem of iterated belief change, both ...

متن کامل

Intellectual Virtues: An Essay in Regulative Epistemology

This is an ambitious book, in two ways. First, it advocates a drastic transformation of contemporary epistemology’s scope and method. Second, it exemplifies a new way of doing epistemology, plumbing the depths of epistemic psychology by subtly characterizing the nature of, and interrelations among, a host of intellectual traits. Part I critiques standard “analytic” epistemology and expounds the...

متن کامل

منابع من

با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید


عنوان ژورنال:
فلسفه دین

جلد ۱۲، شماره ۳، صفحات ۴۸۳-۵۱۴

میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023